So now the pundits are talking more shit

Well,
The 2 leaders got together and welcomed the country to the new alliance.

And what did the pundits do?
Well, the most of them who were on the spot gave their 'expert' view - "trouble ahead, DC was excited and welcoming, while NC was reserved, severe and guarded".  then they got the body langoes in, who tried to cook up some more conspiracy sauce by reading NC as subliminally en garde.
I can't believe journalists can be so crap at their job.

Why not read it another way...
The Liberal Democrats are the minority partner, with voters who really didn't want to vote for conservative policies (so we are told by the same journoes I don't trust, but let's use their own novella to break down their latest theory).  So for public's sake, would it make sense for their leader to appear to be guarding the interests of those who aren't tory sympathisers?  Yes?  Remember, we have the party members and organisation who have all approved the move.

The Conservatives for their part really need the majority to form a government, and also have their own party grumblers who would rather see Francis Urquhart wearing the crown than David Cameron, so shouldn't it make sense that a successful coalition in government with a (Centre Left??) party would strengthen reform of the tories away from the peasant, er pheasant, baggers who regard cemeteries as prime real estate giveaways to business allies, and arms deals as inheritance for their children?
And let's not forget that nice excited David does have scary Michael Howard back in cabinet.

Its funny, no matter how often the journoes call it wrong, they still want to be tabloid king makers and keep writing the script until finally they make us believe their storyline.  Could it really have ben the same journalists 'ramping up' bigot-gate, who then Mills and Booned Gordon Brown's farewell scene as he resigned?

I can't help feeling that journalism in this country is more interested in keeping us all badly informed and stupid, than anything else.

When is a bigot a baddie-boo? When a journo is a piggie-wig

Gordon Goofed!! And called a much to say local lady a bigot in private, thinking the microphone was off.

The media have danced on this like its the bacchanale of lesbos with no tomorrow in the summer of 1968 after an lsd/viagra cocktail accidentally got into all the water, er no, these are journoes, alcohol supply...

COME ON!! Let's stop being patronised.

If you listen to the poor man, he wasn't rabid, he didn't call the woman a 'northern bitch', or witch for that matter, or even a bastard like John Major did, he called her a bigot.


And what is a bigot?  Someone with entrenched prejudiced ideas that won't be moved by reason, nothing worse.
Is this bad language to use? No.
Was it complementary? No.
Was he right? I don't know, I don't think so judging by what I heard.
Was it said in private? Yes.
Was it said by someone under pressure of a tight schedule, judging the encounter a mistake, and putting it in the light of it should never have happened, when he is fighting for his job, and his beliefs, and disagreed with the person? Yes.
Is it understandable, have we ever done anything like that?  don't you fucking lie and say no, because then I know you will have done worse.

The journoes with their cynical mockery and band wagon jumping king making pride most certainly will have done much worse.

I am not defending Labour, or joining sides, or being contrary.  I just think the baying crowd need to pipe down and stop their hypocrisy.

Any way, now, I beleive the good lady socialist is about to make a lot of money from the gaffe, so maybe thanks are in order...

Sweeney Todd The Brownie

Tim Burton and Johnnie Depp done themselves proud again with their new release, ably aided and abetted by Helena Bonham Carter. Sweeney Todd: the Demon Barber of Fleet Street is due for general release in the UK 25th January, but not to be upstaged by the Hollywood Dream Machine Dr. Gordon Brown has ideas of his own for all our body parts.

Yes.  MR. Brown has decided not only should we pay all our earnings to the government, smokers pay tax to the NHS, drinkers and drivers too, but they own our body parts also whether we choose it or not.  Don't be fooled.  What starts as an option will eventually become compulsory, and once we are all criminalised by the plethora of laws they have passed in their short but oh too long 10 years, they will be able to match DNA files up for candidates to keep themselves alive forever.  And if they don't need them, there's always someone who will arrive, plead poverty and oppression, get GIVEN a nice big house some of you might may have been waiting for for years, and then help themselves to you heart, lungs, and liver, maybe once you're deal if you are lucky, under the NHS you have been paying taxes for for years, but couldn't get an appointment under for your by now chronic condition.

Hey, I have a preventative proposition of my own: 

TELL THE LUNE-POTS RUNNING OUR LIVES RAGGED NOW TO GO FUCK OFF.

Soon to come: The New Labour remake of THE BODY SNATCHERS.

Be afraid, BE VERY AFRAID.

On Gordon Brown

It always makes me laugh to hear a fat man talk about a lean economy...

But anyway, I want to know why we as an in debt nation of borrowers should get excited about getting further into debt by taking on the expense of hosting the world cup, and make no mistake it will run to a loss, when we are already being told the bid for the Olympics was half of what the current cost estimate stands at, and that is 5 years away!!!

Well, next time I hear someone order a double whopper with cheese and a DIET coke, I will think of Gordy {Though to be honest, I am sure his policy advisors and private secretary would probably order it with mayo too!}, I will think of his his lean economy, and I will think of all that preaching about sound housekeeping and financial prudence we get from our 'betters' in Westminster, not to mention all that crap about carbon footprints, which don't by the way, get reduced by Prestige Development Projects.

If they are hell bent on spending OUR money this way at least don't build it all in a part of the country that will be 40 metres under water when temperatures go up from the carbon produced by the diggers, and then be arsy enough to tax us for global warming.

I COMMEND THIS BUDGET TO THE HOUSE!